Why can't disagreeing be fun? — David Brady Helps

Get the blog, direct to your inbox every day. Subscribe or use RSS.

Why can't disagreeing be fun?

What if “passionately disagreeing” was fun? And as the level of “fun” rises does “seriousness” fall?

Disagreeableness can mean competitive, skeptical, blunt, uncooperative, and/or insensitive. What’s not listed is: “fun.”

The opposite of disagreeable is agreeable. Attributes of agreeable people: trusting, cooperative, considerate, sincere, and modest. What’s not listed: “fun.”

The idea of “fun” or “play” doesn’t appear to be a factor of any type and intensity of agreeableness. “Seriousness” the same — it doesn’t appear attached to agreeableness.

“Play” and “seriousness” are also not opposites of each other — they can exist at the same time. I “play” music and I am “serious” about how I play.

If all that is true, then disagreements ought to be seriously fun.

Leadership thougth - the most important thing now

Two interesting questions.